Should Hays High silence the Rebel yell? School board to reconsider Rebel mascot, fight song | The Hays Free Press

Should Hays High silence the Rebel yell? School board to reconsider Rebel mascot, fight song

Posted by on Jun 13th, 2012 and filed under Featured, Hays County, Kyle, Top Stories.


 

A Confederate battle flag flies above a Hays Rebel fan’s pickup at a football game in 2010. The flag is banned on Hays CISD campuses. (Photo by Cyndy Slovak-Barton)

by KIM HILSENBECK

Following a vandalism incident at Hays High School in which two 14-year-olds are accused of writing racially motivated graffiti and urinating on the classroom door of a black teacher, the Hays CISD community appears once again divided over the use of the school’s Confederate imagery.

Some parents and community members are calling for the removal of the Rebel mascot and the school’s fight song, “Dixie,” saying they contribute to an attitude of racial intolerance.

But there are also passionate arguments for keeping the school’s traditions alive because many say those traditions have to do with pride, not hate.

Superintendent Jeremy Lyon said the district is working to develop a response to the larger issue of racial intolerance within the district that is not reactionary to the vandalism.

“I want to do it right,” Lyon said. “We’re going to treat this in a way that’s built to last.”

Lyon said he and the Board of Trustees have also begun to explore the issue of how the Confederate imagery may play a role in the community as well as how others outside Hays County perceive the district because of it.

“The context of how we feel about allegiance to the fight song and mascot must be balanced against an external audience and how it feels,” Lyon said.

He said he will discuss with the board whether or not to go down the road of changing the high school’s mascot and fight song.

“The trustees represent the values of the community,” Lyon said. “This recent incident gives the board an opportunity to examine that issue.”

Use of the Confederate flag at Hays High was banned about 10 years ago following another racially charged incident.

Former Hays CISD Trustree David Wiley was on the board when school officials created a policy that does not allow Confederate flags on campus or at athletic games.

“There is a subtle racial undercurrent at Hays High,” said Wiley, whose daughter graduated from the school and was the band drum major.

Wiley said that undercurrrent is not conveyed by the school district but is perpetuated by members of the community.

“For the high school students, it [the mascot, fight song and flag] was just pride and spirit, but the adults knew exactly what this was about,” Wiley said.

He also said he thinks there is a phenomenon he calls the “Hays Bubble” — people who lived in the county their entire lives may not realize the school’s Confederate imagery is offensive to other people outside the local community.

At the time of his board term, Wiley said the Texas Education Agency received complaints from other districts that competed against Hays High School in UIL sports, which is why the board decided to tackle the Confederate flag as the school symbol. The board did not try to remove “Dixie.”

“Banning the flag was a big enough bite of the apple,” Wiley said.

The mascot, a caricature of the school’s namesake Capt. Jack C. Hays, had his Rebel flag and guns removed during the last community-wide debate.

In 2000, school officials created a policy that does not allow Confederate flags on campus or at athletic games. Clothing and other accessories with the Rebel flag are also banned at Hays High, and students who wear such items run the risk of having them confiscated.

One person who may have been more adamant about adhering to the dress code was the teacher who was the target of the racially tinged vandalism, Wanda Murphy.

Murphy is also said to have been a vocal opponent of the Rebel mascot and fight song. Indeed, some community members who contacted the Hays Free Press, or commented on the paper’s website and Facebook page, indicated Murphy made the Rebel imagery about racial discrimination.

A comment by “HaysMom” illustrates this viewpoint:

“This teacher is well known for speaking poorly about this school and its traditions meaning the flag and mascot. The rebel flag was flying at HHS long before she became an employee.”

A comment by “Lori” echoes that sentiment:

“This teacher used her position to impose her beliefs.”

Similar comments appear to be a thinly veiled attempt to place blame on Murphy for the actions of the two teenagers in question. District officials are quick to support Murphy, who did not respond to requests for comment.

“Blaming the victim of a crime for the crime is reprehensible. No one deserves to be victimized because of their beliefs, opinions, or positions on issues,” said Tim Savoy, Hays CISD spokesman.

The superintendent asked the Anti Defamation League for help with the broader issues of racial attitudes towards others and maintaining a positive environment for students and employees free from intolerant, hurtful or hateful attitudes and action.

“The district strives to achieve a place where diversity is not only respected, but celebrated,” Savoy said.

In response to the debate sparked in the aftermath of the vandalism, the Hays Free Press conducted a non-scientific online survey to gather input from readers and other community members.

The poll garnered 750 responses from across the age and ethnic spectrum, as well as length of time in Hays County.

The results show sharp divisions on both sides of the issues among those who participated.

On one side are those who believe the Rebel mascot and Dixie song are simply about Southern pride and school tradition, not hate or prejudice.

On the other side are those who think the mascot and fight song need to be changed because they evoke the country’s painful past with slavery.

The majority of respondents said the Rebel mascot is an appropriate representation for the school, with those in the youngest and oldest age groups showing the strongest agreement at 84 and 75 percent, respectively.

Hays High students who took the survey feel more strongly than other age groups that the imagery of the mascot and fight song are not tied to racism and are instead linked to school pride.

Of survey respondents younger than 18 years old, most of whom say they are Hays High students, 84 percent do not want the mascot to change. An equal amount of the youngest respondents also do not want to see the fight song changed.

Sixty-five percent of the respondents who are older than 65 want the mascot to stay, while less than 70 percent of the middle age group cohorts agreed. Three quarters of older respondents want the school to keep Dixie as the fight song.

About a third of respondents in each of the remaining age cohorts think the district should change it.

Below are comments from those who responded to our survey, grouped by age of respondent:

Under 18
The (African American) teacher that had racist comments and stuff done to her classroom was racist to myself and other classmates. She would make racist remarks downgrading white and other ethnicities.

 

Often at lunch I’d hear kids calling other students terrible slurs like “dirty Mexican” or the n-word. Some kids will be hurtful or rude to black or Hispanic students simply because of their race.

 

The mascot or fight song of Hays HS has absolutely nothing to do with racial intolerance at school. Acts of racism committed are due to people’s ignorance and lack of respect and education. If you believe the contrary, that the mascot and fight song do represent racism, then the true positive and peaceful meaning of two are obviously beyond your grasp and your thoughts and opinions shouldn’t count due to your extreme ignorance.

 

I’m going into my senior year at Hays next year and have yet to see a day when racism of some form is not within the walls of Hays. Many students in Hays High School are arrogant and ignorant teenagers who claim racism isn’t shown by the Rebel Flag and Dixie, but the fact is they’re wrong. The Rebel Flag and Dixie fight song are historical and present day symbols of racism not only from the Civil War but from opposition of the Civil Rights Movement and current white supremeists. This is not how I want to be represented when I graduate.

 

18-34
While I personally have never experienced a specific instance of racism at the high school, the fascination with Confederate imagery and the desire to hold on to that imagery for the sake of “tradition” is ignorant and makes the school look bad to any informed onlooker.

 

As a former teacher at Hays I heard from my students of various races how uncomfortable the schools symbols made them feel. I always wanted my students to feel safe but these symbols did not allow for that.

 

As a school our association with the fight song and our mascot has nothing to do with racism. I see nothing wrong with either factors in this survey. I was in the rebel band and was very proud of our school traditions. The act of racism in this vandalism crime was not caused by the fight song or our mascot.

 

I graduated from Hays in 2001, and grew up in the school system.  At the time I thought it was fine.  Now however, after living in the world outside of Kyle, Texas – it is seen as pretty insensitive.  My main point of contention though is why is Col. Jack C Hays represented as a confederate soldier?  Wasn’t he a Texas Ranger? Wasn’t the original school theme centered around the Texas Rangers?  Why then did it change/become centered around confederate symbolism?

 

There was NO racism or rasist activities. I think two STUPID KIDS shouldnt be the reason generations of traditions should be changed.

 

I work with students in Hays CISD, but am not employed [by] or affiliated with the school district. During my time at Hays HS I have witnessed students bearing items with the rebel flag (purses, t-shirts, stickers, etc.) and I’ve questioned students about their feelings. Most of the students didn’t see the issue and were not aware of the meaning behind the rebel flag and their school mascot. I have seen some school staff members take offense to the display of the rebel flag, while others defend it’s symbolism of ‘southern pride’. I was not aware of Hays HS’s fight song, but I agree that it is also inappropriate. There is currently a state-wide controversy involving a specialized license plate with the rebel flag and I disagree with that as well. It’s obviously offensive at a state-wide level, I can’t understand how it has managed to be a school mascot/symbol.

 

I remember this being an issue while I was a senior in high school (class of 2000). I remember that flying the flag seemed to be the bigger conflict at the time and the school to steps to phase it out. The flag was take off uniforms and was slightly altered on school shirts. Good or bad Texas was a member of the Confederacy during the Civil War.  If people took a history class then they would know that the Civil War was NOT just about slavery. Getting rid of a mascot or changing the fight song is not going to stop people from hating other groups/minorities.

 

For some people I know that it really is just a tradition, but I know when I attended Hays there were several classmates that considered the flag as not only their mascot but a symbolism of their dislike of Blacks. I don’t think a school mascot should have any characteristics that can be looked at in this way.  I know that not everyone does, but it only takes a few to poison the school. If we had a different mascot, such as a Bulldog or Mustang then there are no questions about the motives.
The Confederate flag is till worn as a symbol of pride even though it bothers some of the students/teachers.  We had 2 African American teachers at Hays and both left due to issues with dixie/rebel.  While people can say they didn’t have to work here, that is the same argument people made during the 60′s.  They should be able to work anywhere without feeling discriminated against.

 

I don’t believe the Rebel mascot or the “Dixie” fight song incite racial intolerance — but both repulse me. Col. Hays as a historical figure is an appropriate mascot. A “Rebel” not so much as it brings to mind Johnny Reb. Emphasize the Col.’s historical importance, leadership qualities, etc. “Dixie” as a fight song is completely inappropriate, and very much about slavery. I’m actually embarrassed that my kids will attend a HS with such a mascot. Feels like a step back in the wrong direction. It seems to cheapen/diminish the image of the school as a place of quality education, like it’s stuck in the “Old South” glory days and hasn’t moved into the 20th century by clinging to this archaic imagery.

 

Never. Its about school pride. Only outsiders see it as being racicts. Its been tradition having col. Jack as our mascot the rebel flag as our colors and dixie as the school song. If you take that away the churches should take their flag away also. If you take this away what else will you change about tradition.

 

We should not be using the rebel flag. That is not appropriate. I’m from Houston and was appalled the first time I saw it at the high school.

 

I worked for Hays for 2.5 years and I asked students to cover up or not wear confederate flags in my classroom. Many did not want to comply, and the principal told me it was their first amendment right to wear the flag. It’s got to go. Kids are completely ignorant of both sides of history when it comes to Dixie and the flag.

 

The people that only see these symbols as a sign of slavery will forever miss what pride means, even if it is not popular. And to try to remove such symbols from our children will only shadow our past that we are not proud of; removing another chance for our children to learn from our mistakes, if you look at the mascot and song from a slavery point of view.  I see removing the song and mascot from our school, so to become more politically correct, would hurt our children more than if we were to shelter them from our fathers’ mistakes.

 

35-54
Why would we want to continue a “tradition” that is offensive and painful to so many others. Times change and we either adapt or in this case get left behind!

 

Rebel Pride never dies!

 

When I moved here in 1983 I could not believe it was legal to have the confederate flag as a symbol for anything state funded especially a school. In American History specifically civil war we covered the south with a twist; pride in the “Dixie “How song, confederacy and “their” flag. I remembering thinking to myself I’ve died and gone to an episode of The Twilight Zone!!!!

 

I’ve not seen any racism at the school; actually, I see the opposite. I see kids who are genuinely nice, accepting, and helpful to others, especially the “underdogs”. However, sadly, in a school with fewer than 25 black students, the mascot and song DO give the wrong impression to others.

 

Most people, esp. the students, don’t even connect Dixie, etc. with slavery anymore.  Certain people just want to keep pulling it up to stir up things.  None of the students I have talked to connect the flag or song to slavery.

 

My daughter went to Hays her Freshman year and the first 6 weeks of her sophomore year. She had nothing but racial attitudes against her and begged to go to Lehman. I’m so glad we made the change. I think Dr. Lyon needs to get off his high horse and do his job. This district does nothing to protect our kids that being bullied and threatened and now nothing for its own employees. I think we need a new superintendent.

 

My children everyday have Hispanic kids talk about them in Spanish–and they think it’s funny.  Remember that racism and racial intolerance goes in many directions other than what media chooses to focus on.

 

Keep the Mascot and Dixie. If you don’t like it move away… It is here to stay and has been around for a long time! Move on if you don’t want to be apart of the Hays Rebel Pride!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

There are so many wonderful things about our Southern Heritage why should we tarnish our loving hospitality with school spirit that is tainted with the painful era of slavery?  We should try not to offend our fellow Americans (whether they be black, white, ) who have fought along each other for our freedom.  We should honor the contributions of all and stay away from an era the South should not be proud of.

 

Hays High School biology teacher Wanda Murphy gave my son detention several times over the past school year for wearing his rebel flag belt buckle to  a relative had given him, although he tried to convince Ms. Murphy he meant no harm and did not feel the flag represented racism but was a part of our history.

 

I am not in high school, but have heard many racially disparaging renarks from Hays parents and residents that I find antiquated and offensive. The song and soldier feeds into this mentality.

 

Seen too many confederate flags on vehicles. Times have change.

 

I just feel a change in the mascot and no more confederate flag would be a chnge in the right direction.

 

I have witnessed many incidents regarding intolerance of racial differences at Hays High School for more than over a decade now.  Visiting schools are bombarded with racial slurs from rebel fans in the stadium parking lot and proudly display the rebel flag.  Racial minority students are expected to carry old athletic issued equipment with the rebel flag on it.  Read the fight song lyrics and identify the non-racists theme.  You can’t. It is obvious that a racist tone is being perpetuated.  Whether you support the rebel fight song, the rebel mascot, the rebel flag or any other iconic symbol of slavery, it is not okay.  Do not think that keeping a politically correct public campaign will make it ok.  It doesn’t.  It sends a message that perpetuates the issue.  Slavery is part of our american history.  It is a dark history that Hays taxpayers should not have to celebrate at their public school.  It is offensive – point blank.  The fact of the matter is that the offended taxpayers are not the majority of stakeholders and/or decision-makers in this district. The root of inspiration may have been birthed is good intent, but today our community demographics have changed.  Isn’t it time Hays High School respects the diversity and change too? Thank you for providing a public forum for a much needed topic of conversation in the Hays community!

 

There needs to be both sides of the story told.  My children, as well as other students have shared information about Mrs. Murphy that should also be shared if she’s is getting the exposure for the recent incident.  I DO NOT condone what happened and those students should be disciplined appropriately according to HAYS CISD policy and procedures.  First off, when Ms. Murphy was hired she knew had to know about the mascot and possibly that the school song was “Dixie”, so if those two things were so offensive to her, she should NOT have worked in this district.  Secondly, she has broken school policy by making students change their shirts or turn them wrong side out if the shirt had anything about “Rebel” on them.

 

I am a former Hays CISD employee.  My children go to schools in Kyle.  I worked in Buda for an elementary school.  I was treated hatefully by what I call the “backward’s wanna-be’s” of Buda.  I think they are stuck in a small town frame of mind and need to step into the 21st century.  I have always heard that Hays was better than Lehman, well I haven’t heard of racial intolerance at Lehman that made the news. As a former employee I find the “No Place For Hate”  a absolute joke.  It happens daily to employees, students and parents. This will not be an isolated incident and will happen again. It does daily, been thorugh it and seen it myself.  I feel my responsibility is to teach my children better and lead by example and pray for those who just don’t get it and are not who they think they are.

 

My experience is that most of the kids don’t even know or realize the meaning behind Dixie or the Rebel flag. They see it as school pride not anything racial. The community has created a line in the sand and some kids feel they need to cross it just to make a point against the adults telling them they “can’t” do something. Racism is taught to the kids it is not something they are born with. We need to teach the kids to not judge others on skin color, sex or any other traits except how you treat others.

 

I hardly belive that we have a racial issue in this county.  This vandalism may have just been a couple of kids destroying property for lack of something constructive to do.

 

This is really an inflamatory questionnaire and is the reason that there are racial problems.  If everyone was a little more tolerant and did not conjure up problems; they would not exist.  The teacher who experienced “racism” needs to learn tolerance as well; as she was a racist to the highest degree!

 

Jack Hays was NOT a Rebel, so he could stay, but the mascot name should not say Rebel. Maybe Rangers?

 

For me, it’s not about the problems within the school as much as the perception of the “rebels” and the unfortunate stereotype the rebel flag has gotten over the years. Outside of Hays County, the rebel is perceived as a negative thing.

 

These students who did the vandalism were just being destructive.  They chose a means that would incite the most anger and it worked.  The issue at hand should not be the song or the rebel icon, it should be the fact that these students had caused problems in the past and they were allowed to return and do it again.  Too often there are students who cause problems and are allowed to return.  Some of these students even caused issues for my kid and were kicked out (sent to impact) but were allowed back at Hays.  They had multiple offenses on their record which included drugs, assault, and vandalism.  But, after they did their time at impact, they were back causing issues again. Does anyone believe that if the song were changed or the icon changed that no other student in the future will write racist things?

 

Your taking away traditions that generations have shared for years!   We we told to have Rebel Pride but that was about the pride we had for ourself and our school!!  It had nothing to do with any hate!

 

None that I consider racist. Have in the past wore (rebel) ball cap and stood for the fight song when my kids attended Hays HS.  I think the time has come for a change because there are so many black kids in the school and I can see how this might bother them and their parents.   Also Hays county is a long long way from the deep south  and dixie.

 

At what point do we hold the young adults accountable for their actions? Its crazy when something horrible that happens like this, the first thing we say is lets change a song, mascot, flags. Lets look at the parents that raised these kids, their lies your problem. Apple doesnt fall far from the tree!

 

I would just like to add that I think many of the kids do not even know the history of the rebel flag; if they did, i think they would understand the impact it has on african americans. if they do and still think it is appropriate then i think this could also say something about them. My opinion may be a little biased because i am black but the flag and mascot are just not positive in my opinion and if that is the case then change it to something that is positive and promotes something more positive for all and the community.

 

(White respondent) I know the teacher involved.  Students frequently use the “N” word on campus.  It is often just shrugged off.

 

(White respondent) Heard a current student on the football team describe playing Anderson last year as playing againt those f’ing N*****s. No joke!

 

65+
Song and name have outlived their usefulness. Keep Ranger Hays as mascot if possible.

 

I believe that “Dixie” is a suitable fight song and that the image of Jack C. Hays is appropriate as he was a local hero.  There was not a good side and a bad side in the Civil War, there were just sides and the War is a large part of our heritage.  Those wishing to be “politically-correct”, a term that I have come to consider a bane to our society, have to realize that changing things like these will not change historical facts.  One of those facts is that Texas was a part of the Confederacy, not the Union during the War.  Eliminating traditions such as these will not eliminate any bigotry that exists, educating the people will.

 

I was band director at Hays HS for 17 years, and an employee of the Hays CISD for almost 20 years.  “Rebels” and “Dixie” are the Hays identifying crests of honor.  It is ridiculous to suggest that either is a “racial slur”.  They only are an indication of pride, honor, and tradition. They are spirit symbols for a school with great pride and tradition. “Dixie” was written by a northerner, and was originally premiered in New Youk City.  President Lincoln requested  a Union military band to play “Dixie” in honor of the South. Hays county is named for the same Jack C. Hays.  Should we change that as well? Ridiculous thought, isn’t it?  Equally so are these suggestions of racism.  Gerald Babbitt

 

This message is not about an incident or situation.  It is a statement.  We have 4 sons that graduated from Hays, 1982; 1984; 1988; 2001.   Racism or racial discrimination was not a problem while they attended Hays. We are proud of the Jack C. Hays Rebels & the Rebel Flag & Mascot.

Related stories:

  • Alisasue

    Now, I suppose, you can “take on”  the “school down the street.”  A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing!

  • courageA

    Camp Ben Reunion in nearby Driftwood involves many families from Kyle and Buda and has been meeting annually for something like 116 years. It is a Confederate reunion camp. The web site for Camp Ben says that it was at one point the largest United Confederate reunion camp in the South. It is going on right now and draws hundreds, maybe thousands.   The consolodated school district originally took in Wimberley, Driftwood and area nearby, as well as Buda and Kyle–at a time that this area was far more rural or small town–almost no subdivisions.  I think the territory of the original school district and the strong ties to Camp Ben probably were the main factors in the choice of the mascot.

  • Jonathanhaney

    Yes, various hate groups have misused and abused the Confederate flag, but they have done the same to the U.S. flag. Regretably, however, some  judge  the Confederate flag and the U.S. flag by different standards and criteria.

    The Confederate battle flag was not a national flag; it was the flag under which the Confederate soldier fought for independence, for the
    protection of his country, his family and his home.

    The socialist Karl Marx said, “People separated from their heritage are easily persuaded.” 

    Adherents of political correctness have been trying to drive a wedge between white and black Southerners for years, and the South continues to be under attack.  People are told that the Confederate flag represents a painful reminder of slavery, racism and bigotry, and that they should be offended by it.  They are being played like puppets  and used as what Lenin called ”useful idiots.”

  • Jonathanhaney

    The Confederate flag was so visible during the 1960s because of the celebration of the Centennial of the War Between the States.  As has been noted elsewhere herein, the vitriolic, almost irrational antipathy on the part of some toward the flag is a rather recent phenomenon.  Credible research reveals its origins to be in the 1980s, revived by a financially strained and scandal-plagued NAACP.  That organization’s president, Kwaise Mfume, turned the issue into a fundraising juggernaut.

  • Daddymack65

     Point#1 – the point is that students are not allowed to wear clothing that is deemed offensive. This has nothing to do with crimes against humanity; however, I’m pretty sure slavery is a crime against humanity. Took plenty of History courses, but decided to pursue Biochemistry instead. History degree is only good if you want to teach History. Thanks for the personal digs. My guess is that you’re probably good at doing this on-line, but less so in person if you know what I mean. Or we could armwrestle!

    Point#2 – I guess the real mistake was calling the Confederacy a nation. It was really a collection of states. You name two examples out of how many defeated nations.

    Point#3 -  Germany and France, the two most populous countries aside from Russia affected by WWII,  don’t really limit free speech. Not sure about the U.K.

    Point#4 – At least we can agree on that one.

    Point#5 – Simply said that those two states are not allowed to host NCAA tournament games or bowl games.  This is not voted on or determined by the public in those states, but by the NCAA and it is due to the negativity associated with the flag.

    Point#6 – Again, didn’t say anything about the U.S. flag. Don’t know anyone in this country that associates the U.S. flag with hate groups. Confederate battle flag? Yep! Were you in Berlin when the wall fell or did you see the Confederate flag on tv, which only airs totally unbiased reports.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1659828744 Lila Knight

    I think it is totally appropriate for the Camp Ben Reunion to honor the Confederate Heritage. That is where it should happen. 

    But what, exactly, does Camp Ben have to do with our schools?Nothing.BUT Camp Ben is where we should be honoring our Confederate past. That totally works for me. Personally.

    And if your really had courage “courageA” – you would post with your real name. I am certain that your Confederate ancestors would have no problem with it. :)

    Stand up and be counted. With your name. If this is truly about honor.

  • courageA

    I don’t care if they change mascots.  I was just giving some info because some were wondering how the mascot came about.  relax

  • Mike Fulton

     Can you please show me the constitutional protection for slavery? 

  • Davyjean

    Lila has a way of trying to turn the conversation! :>)

  • Davyjean

    Articles I and IV of the U.S. Constitution:  An analysis of the three-fifths compromise, the slave trade clause, and the fugitive-slave law all point to the Framers’ intentions in the creation of the Constitution.   The Corwin Amendment, supported by U.S. President Lincoln and approved by the U.S. Congress (it would have been the 13th Amendment to the Constitution), would have further protected slavery — into perpetuity.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1659828744 Lila Knight

    And apparently – so do you…..LOL

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1659828744 Lila Knight

    Declaration of Independence:
    “WE hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.”
    1776

  • john s

    read more history…most of the founding fathers, including some of the big names like washington and of course jefferson,  were slave owners and some even suggested that the constitution not apply to slaves else it would unravel the economy and social and political statuses of a number of affluent members of society…so it was seen as a necessary evil back then.

  • Coltonswayne

    There you go again…Mike’s question was where in the Constitution was slavery protected?

  • Williamfriersonfulton

    In Abraham Lincoln’s first inaugural address he clearly stated, “I have no  purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists.  I believe I HAVE NO LAWFUL RIGHT TO DO SO (emphasis added), and I have no inclination to do so.”

  • Donn Brooks

    The Declaration of Independence was issued by the Second Continental Congress, some years before the adoption of the Constitution of 1789.  Not to be argumentative, but I am not sure it ever had any standing in law.  Generally, we do not devote enough time to the Articles of Confederation, which preceded the current constitution.

  • Charlesedwarddenison

    Thanks for the info.  Your response should have been directed to Lila; hope she’s now better informed, too.

  • Charlesedwarddenison

    It was reported in a recent article in Veterans Today that the current best estimate for  the death toll of the War Between the States  is 750,000 American soldiers and at least 50,000 Southern civilians. Adjusted to current population, that’s the equivalent today of 8 million Americans dying in four years.  Quite a price to pay…and it doesn’t include the cost in dollars!

  • Mike Fulton

     That all sounds really good, if you don’t bother to read the constitution, but it doesn’t hold up if you do.  Please, find me anything in Art I or IV to support your claim. 

    The 3/5′s statement applies to slaves (at the time) but does not even mention them only “all other persons” which would also include non-citizens. 

    The “fugitive slave act” came about in the mid 1800′s and had nothing more to do with the “framers” of our nation than a law written today would. 

    And, fully half of your argument about the constitutional protection of slavery is dedicated to a constitutional amendment that failed to pass. 

  • Mike Fulton

     Yes, it was seen as a “necessary evil” back then and clearly the founders did not think the constitution applied to blacks, but they did not put any constitutional protection for slavery into the constitution. 

  • Mike Fulton

     Does that count as constitutional protection for slavery?  That’s the claim that was made. 

  • Donn Brooks

    Well, all this is difficult.  Without consulting them, I do not believe the ennumerated powers mentions slavery one way or another.  That fairly well means that Congress was without powers to regulate slavery.  So, evidently, the framers did not find slavery an issue that the national government should concern itself with.  I suppose that is a tacit approval of the practice, but that would not be a strong argument.

  • Donn Brooks

    I don’t think there is much question that the 3/5 compromise was aimed at slaves.  I will grant, as I read the compromise, that the issue is open to interpretation and I am wondering if there is cda

  • Donn Brooks

    I am not at peace with the response/comment program.  To continue the former comment, I wonder if there is case law regarding the 3/5 compromise.  But, as I said, I do not find much to debate:  the compromise was aimed at slavery.

  • Vanessa

    I went to school at hays high school and san marcos high school and I will say racisim is in every school no matter the mascot or fight song. In san marcos there were always kids talking about each other and making racial remarks. When I went to hays I never had any problems with racisim and never saw it at hays high and I am hispanic. I went to hays high my sophomore year 2003-2004 then went back to san marcos. I dont think the fight song or mascot should change. I still wear my hays shirt til this day and it has the confederate flag on the back and the front topcorner but to me its just a school flag.

  • Williamfriersonfulton

    Well…it indicates to me that Lincoln recognized that slavery was constitutionally protected, and that, even if he wanted to, it wouldn’t be lawful for him to try.

  • Williamfriersonfulton

    Strong enough!  The U.S. Congress, in 1860, evidently felt that the Constitution protected slavery — and Lincoln obviously felt it did as well.   The Corwin Amendment, passed by Congress with Lincoln’s support, would have amended the Constitution to ensure that future congresses could not interfere with the institution, i.e., it would have protected slavery into perpetuity.

  • Williamfriersonfulton

    Speaking of the “unaware” and the clueless, you could learn something by googling “Kool-Aid” and “Jim Jones” or “Jonestown.”   There are no racial connotations to Kool-Aid!

  • Williamfriersonfulton

    That certainly would have changed with the passage of the Corwin Amendment which, in 1860, the U.S. Congress passed with Lincoln’s support!

  • Williamfriersonfulton

    This clause explains that the number of persons in each state, for the purpose of representation and taxation, is to be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons three fifths “of all other Persons”   Although the word slave is not mentioned, “all other Persons” certainly implies it.

    This method of counting slaves had previously been debated in the Continental Congress. It was part of a compromise devised by James Madison in 1783 .

  • Williamfriersonfulton

    Although the word “slave” is not mentioned in the three-fifths clause, “all other Persons” certainly implies it.

    Your original question was about constitutional protection for slavery — you said nothing about the Framers.

    Regarding the referenced constitutional amendment, it passed both the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate before the secession of Southern states, and it was actually  ratified by a number of  Northern states.  Rather curiously, it’s still on the books!

  • Albertbandrews

    Not much to debate at all!

  • Davidgrahamfulton

    Dear Kim Hilsenbeck, I can understand your initial reaction to these kids’ actions; however, it needs to be said that the great actuator of such actions is ignorance. To a large extent that ignorance is perpetuated in schools and the workplace when teachers, bureaucrats, journalists and adults are unable to speak to the truth and discuss the issues that are important because they are often steeped in the bonds of political correctness and lack of knowledge themselves. It’s not the least bit important how you “look to outsiders.”  What is important is how you learn to deal with the ignorance that is at the heart of what is going on.
    The adults have a great deal of learning to do before they can really begin to deal with what is happening. The (Confederate) flag is simply a straw dog that is used by those who know nothing of the real nature of the South.  As I mentioned, I have mailed you a copy to you of The UnCivil War – Shattering the Historical Myths.  If you read it, you will begin to gain some understanding of how many of the myths were created and why they are perpetuated.  Those who do not understand this war and what it was all about will never get a grasp of this nation and of the very problems you are having to deal with. HK understands. For the school board to “examine this incident in the larger context of how the Rebel mascot and Dixie fight song may contribute to an undercurrent of racism at the school” is simply a politically correct and superficial way to deal with their own ignorance and will do nothing to provide any learning nor insights for anyone. Frankly, it is simply a shiver looking for a spine to run up. Respectfully, David MorganExecutive EditorThe Tribune Papers
     

  • Albertbandrews

    Had the Confederate Army followed up its victory at First Manassas (Bull Run) and the Confederacy achieved its independence, then the federal Fugitive Slave Act would have become defunct:   a slave in Virginia who escaped into Pennsylvania (or any other U.S. state) would have been free forever with no federal bounty on his head.  This would have broken the economic back of slavery in Virginia, causing the state to do what states like New York  had done just a few years earlier (1853) and end slavery  by peaceful, legal and constitutional means. 

  • Donn Brooks

    All this gets its full share of discussion on a frequent basis.  Standing alone, the Confederacy never had a chance.  It had only one foundry, at the Tredager Iron Works in Richmond.  Had the Confederacy won at Antietam (Sharpstown) they might have received recognition from England and that could have changed things.  But, absent help from an outside source, they had no chance. 

  • Donn Brooks

    In my brutish and ignorant state, obvious as it is, I never heard of kool-aid in a pejorative sense toward any ethnicity.  I have heard it as propaganda effort.  However, when it comes to assigning labels of racism to people, we all know that anything goes.

  • Jonathanhaney

    I think that had Atlanta not fallen when it did Lincoln would not have been re-elected in1864.  In that eventuality all bets would have been off; the Peace Democrats, whose nominee was George B. McClellan, Lincoln’s former commander of the Army of the Potomac, wanted a negotiated peace at almost any price.  The War was not popular in the North, given the horrific Union fatalities and casualties.

  • Jonathanhaney

    As has already been pointed out,
    slavery was ended in other civilized countries without warfare.

  • Donn Brooks

    This might well be true.  McLellan had all but refused to fight at the beginning of the war.  But, of course, Lincoln won and with that victory underscored his credibility in a significant way.  The Election of 1864, big as it was, was not as important as the July 1863 victories at Gettysburg and Vicksburg.  It took a while for the full impact of those losses to be felt, but for the South, it was over with these two battles. 

  • Adolphusgandrews

    I don’t either Gettysburg or Vicksburg had the impact of Scott’s Anaconda Plan.

    But, you know, the South had the option of contin-      uing the 
    fight:  by guerilla warfare.  General Lee rejected the idea, not wanting to  expose America to warfare that could have continued for years, devastat-  the nation.  

  • Adolphusgandrews

    I don’t think either Gettysburg or Vicksburg had the impact of Scott’s Anaconda Plan.
    Regardless, the South did have the option of continuing the fight:  by guerrilla warfare.  General Lee, however, rejected the idea, not wanting to expose the country to devastating fratricidal warfare that could have continued for years.

  • Adolphusgandrews

    Reply to Donn Brooks:

    I don’t think either Gettysburg or Vicksburg had the impact of Scott’s Anaconda Plan.

    Regardless, the South did have the option of continuing the fight:  by guerrilla warfare.  General Lee, however, rejected the idea, not wanting to expose the country to devastating fratricidal warfare that could have continued for years (think Kansas-Missouri).

  • Donn Brooks

    Oh, certainly you are right.  Anaconda was brilliant.  Gettysburg and Vicksburg, though, represented the final gasp.  Had the Confederacy won either of these battles they might have held out a little longer, but not by much.  No, Anaconda was brilliant, but it only worked because of the superior resources enjoyed by the North.

  • LadyReb

    Please don’t change the flag and mascot. It is a tradition and the students will be racist if they already have that in them whether it’s a peacock or a rebel. The bullying, racism, all the negatives will be in a society and in a school. Changing something that is a part of the school that makes them proud is not the way to go.  All of us have been teenagers and when someone or some establishment goes against what we are proud of it stirs up feelings and emotions that probably we don’t want to mess with. Why don’t we focus on teaching our history both sides of it the good and the bad, target on bullying. Don’t mess with the school’s tradition and the students’ pride.

  • katy

    I graduated from Hays two years ago, but even when i got to the high school as a freshman, things had already changed. In fact, even the following year as a sophomore, they stopped playing Dixie throughout the hallways on game days and during playoffs which was big for myself particularly because I myself was an athlete on a team who always went far into playoffs. As a senior, it’s a tradition to wear overalls and deck them out in rebel pride, however, we could not represent those overalls at school due to the rebel flag like previous senior classes could before us. The rebel flag, Dixie, and the mascot are all part of the rebel pride that those students parade around because of their vast amount of school spirit. i will be the first to say that school spirit and school pride has gone down immensly and it has to do with taking away the ways that the students can support their school. adutls and students who claim that those in favor of keeping the mascot and the fight song are just ignorant and don’t know what it means. that’s not true. going into high schoo, we were already taught about racism, and definitely going into my upperclassman years, we were well aware of what the confederate flag and dixie were used as. however, people like myself who gladly represent both and represented the hays rebels proudly at games chose to see these symbols as things of rebel pride and school spirit. yes, racsim is still here today, but we actually look over that and look at being hays rebels. you have african-american players on the team that gladly wave the flag because it’s the team they play for. you have hispanics like myself that are also targeted with racism that pay no mind to that aspect when it comes to game time. waving the rebel flag, playing and singing along to dixie, and the mascot have nothing to do with ignorance and racism, it all has to do with rebel pride and great school spirit. keep the song, keep the mascot, bring it all and keep the pride alive. rebel pride never dies!!!

  • Oyoudidn’tknow

     How long have you lived here? I have lived here my whole life.People need to stop trying to blame our tradition for what these kids did. It was not right what they did but it could have happen at any school. I am a Hispanic male who went to Hays.I love the rebel flag, fight song and mascot. I wore a rebel tie and flew the flag when I was there from 96-00. People now a days are soft and complain about everything. In my opinion one of the biggest racist group is the NAACP they do not know the differences between racism and heritage. If someone was to call me a beaner I would not be offended because it’s just aword and I am ok with it. And here is a fact for you rocky tx most people that live here are Hispanic and we did not have an issue with being rebels. But in 2000 our rival was san marcos and the NAACP try to say everyone from Kyle and Buda were racist and all the news people just interview white and black people they did not ask Hispanics  what we thought. I am not going to talk bad about this teacher who was saying her opinion about our school. But if she look back in history yes whites did have slaves but the people in charge of making sure slaves would not run were black workers on horses but people don’t talk about that I wounder why?

  • Sunshinekayce

    Changing a mascot and a fight song @ Hays HS is by no means going to stop the perpetuation of racism. Ignorance and hatred towards another group wether its race, religion, gender or sexual orientation is a much larger issue than a masot & song. I’ve done a little research and there are supposedly 27 counties named after Confederate soldiers in Texas- I found 19 in my own. There are also 9 other schools across Texas that have the Rebel mascot one happens to be down I-35 at Travis HS in Austin. The other one I can think of is Robert Lee HS in Midland Texas. As a state employee I’m allowed Confederate Heroes Day as an optional holiday should I choose to take it. It just happens to fall right around MLK’s birthday. Like it or not Texas was a Confederate star during the Civil War. It cannot be changed or swept under the rug because people don’t like it. Are we going to change counties across Texas or make other schools change their mascots?? Political correctness is a slippery slope. It sound to me that Hays has already discontinued use of the flag (I know they were phasing it out when I was in HS 12 years ago) it’s against school dress code to wear the flag now then students who violate the dress code need to change clothes or be disciplined appropriately. I am in NO way condoning the actions of ignorant children that wrote racially charged but if this teacher had issues with the schools mascot and song why did she accept the position at Hays?

  • Donn Brooks

    This just in:  Probably the most repulsive decision in the history of the United States Supreme Court was the case of Dred Scott v. Sanford.  In that decision, Roger Taney wrote according to my sources :  He is most remembered for delivering the majority opinion in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), that ruled, among other things, that African Americans, having been considered inferior at the time the Constitution was drafted, were not part of the original community of citizens and could not be considered citizens of the United States.  Taney, however misguided, may have a constitutiuonal basis for his opinion.  I intend to investigate this further.  I have no idea what it was to which Taney was referring unless it was the 3/5  compromise, but it might be fun to investigate the matter.  Can somebody help explain Taney’s twisted logic in this matter?

  • Hemi1969

    You may wanna check the bales gym version of good ole captain jack.

  • Presleegrace

     The South might have held out a great deal longer had it, as was suggested, engaged in guerrilla warfare.  General Lee, however, rejected the idea, not wanting to put the country through years of fratricidal warfare (think Kansas and Missouri, but on a much, much larger scale).

Advertisement

Recent Comments

Latest Headlines

The Hays Free Press on Facebook

Photo Gallery

120x600 ad code [Inner pages]
Log in

The forecast for 78640 by Wunderground for WordPress

| Congratulations, you read all the way to the bottom.