No school accountability? Business group draws line | The Hays Free Press
Joe Bacon for web with HFP

No school accountability? Business group draws line

Posted by on Jul 5th, 2012 and filed under Schools, Texas Tribune.


by MORGAN SMITH and ZOË GIOJA
Texas Tribune

Leaders in the business community said Wednesday that they would not stand for increased funding for education if it came with any rollback of accountability standards in Texas public schools.

“If we are going to remain competitive in the world’s market, we are going to have to have an educated workforce. We do not have one today,” said Bill Hammond, the president of the Texas Association of Business. “We will vigorously oppose additional money for the public school system unless and until we are certain that the current accountability system is going to be maintained.”

The Capitol news conference, held by the Texas Coalition for a Competitive Workforce and advertised as one that would “change the debate” over school accountability, comes as the standardized testing that is the backbone of the state accountability system is facing considerable backlash from parents, educators and lawmakers.

The controversy has been connected less to the rigorous new STAAR exams — which students took for the first time this spring and were developed to be better aligned to curriculum — and more to the logistics of their implementation and new rules about the way the tests factor into grading and graduation requirements.

After criticism from parents and lawmakers and widespread confusion among school districts about how to apply a rule that new end-of-course exams account for 15 percent of high school students’ final grades, TEA decided to delay its implementation for a year. More than 400 school boards have passed a resolution against high-stakes testing, saying that it is “strangling our public schools.”

The House Public Education Committee has held two hearings on the topic where lawmakers expressed support for doing away with the 15 percent rule. Educators also testified about their intense frustration with the costs associated with the exams.

But Wednesday, members of the workforce coalition — which includes groups influential in the Legislature like the Texas Association of Business, Texas Institute for Education Reform, Texas Public Policy Foundation and the Texas Business Leadership Council (formerly the Governor’s Business Council) — made clear they would not support any kind of tweaks to the system that was established by House Bill 3 in 2009. An attempt by outgoing House Public Education chairman Rob Eissler to do just that during the last legislative session failed with the opposition of the business community.

“Before this landmark piece of legislation, HB3, is even fully implemented, we have people who want to roll it back and go back to fight the old wars about teaching to the test and all these other myths that are out there,” said Jim Windham, chairman of Texas Institute for Education Reform.

They argued that the existing system is the only way to ensure taxpayers know their money is being well spent.

“STAAR testing is an excellent step towards ensuring that the state’s education dollars are being directed into the classroom so that college- and workforce-ready students emerge from Texas public schools,” said James Golsan, an education policy analyst for the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a conservative think tank.

The Wednesday announcement has drawn reaction from at least one of the grassroots organizations that has formed to oppose high stakes standardized tests. Texans Advocating for Meaningful Student Assessment, a group of parents and business owners across the state, released a statement taking “strong issue” with what they called the coalition’s attempt to “hold hostage” support for additional funding for education.

The group said the announcement did nothing to “change the debate,” calling the coalition’s assertion that it was “only a pipe dream of those who wish they did not have to answer to parents and legislators regarding the obvious flaws of the STAAR system.”

Dineen Majcher, an Austin attorney and public school parent, responded in particular to Hammond’s remarks that school superintendents are “scaring moms” by saying their children won’t be able to get into college.

“As parents, including mothers, we take great offense at these remarks,” said Majcher, who is also a Texans Advocating for a Meaningful Student Assessment group member. “Does Mr. Hammond truly mean to suggest that parents, and in particular, ‘moms,’ cannot evaluate the quality of a school assessment system? Or that parents cannot judge for themselves how their child’s school is performing?”

After lawmakers cut $5.4 billion from public education funding in 2011, more than half of the school districts in Texas, representing roughly 3.5 million students — or 75 percent of the overall total — have signed on to sue the state. A key part of their argument is that the Legislature has failed to provide enough funding for them to adequately meet the accountability standards they have put in place.

The Texas Association of Business has joined a separate lawsuit against the state related to school funding, one that asks the courts to determine whether the current system is “efficient” as required by the Texas Constitution.

Related stories:

  • guest

    We have allowed children to get through our school system while learning NOTHING and we all are suffering or will suffer because of it.  I say raise standards for all and fail all who do not get there.  School is too easy today.  Making school easier is ludicrous in an age when it is harder than ever to make a good living.

  • Donn Brooks

    OK Guest, I am assuming you want your nine-year old daughter in a class with a twelve year old boy.  I assume you are not impressed by the statistic that students who have been retained seldom do better the second year than they did the first time in that grade level.  I would like your respoonses to these propositions.  Moreover, I assume you have made known to local administrators and board members regarding the need for a curicullum audit at the local district level. 

  • Mike Fulton

     School is easy today?  Last year I learned about the math classes my 6th grade daughter will be taking on her way to graduation.  They have the paths all planned out for that starting in 6th grade. 

    Today the normal kids, the ones who aren’t exceptional in any way, take the same math classes in high school that only the super smartest kids took when I graduated 20 years ago.  The smart kids take math classes 3 levels above what the smart kids took when I graduated.  Stuff that recently was taught to college sophomores before you graduate HS.  My 6th grade daughter took the math in 6th grade that I took in 8th grade, and I was in AP math. 

    Every generation the kids are learning more than the generation before.  The things they learn may change (do we really need to spend time on cursive?) but the level of learning is higher. 

    I understand that we have to claim that the upcoming generation is not as smart, tough, disciplined, respectful, etc. as we were but the reality is we were just like them – only dumber  =)

  • willmcmanus

    Guest – having a child that just graduated from Hays High I can tell you for sure that high school is much tougher today than when I graduated from Hays in 1987. There is significantly more academic pressure and the classes, particularly AP, are as tough as they come. Go take AP Chemistry or Physics or Calculus and let me know what you think. I bet you come away impressed. Even if you make perfect scores I think you will appreciate the challenge.

    I also believe that you have to be careful judging the success (or failure) of a district based on the average scores. You have to look at school districts on a campus-by-campus basis to see what is really going on. There are a significant number of variables that determine student success and also many ways to measure it.I agree that our schools can do better but lets not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

  • Donn Brooks

    Mike Fulton:  For crying out loud, you sure know how to hurt people with your good statements.  Guest:  It is this simple:  you can either respond to Mr. Fulton or you should just be quiet.  Willmacmanus:  You make mighty fine points.  Guest:  the ball is in your court.  What say you?

  • Mike Fulton

     I am on a quest to irritate you with reasonable posts.  It’s a challenge, but I love being challenged.  =)

  • Donn Brooks

    Mike:  Your posts certainly do not irritate me, except through jealousy perhaps, since you express yourself so well that I wish I had said what you have said.  Guest:  Please answer Mike Fulton.  Where are you guest?

  • Mike Fulton

     Don’t sell yourself short, your posts rarely disappoint. 

  • veteran teacher

    “Harder” or “easier” isn’t the question.  What gets marked off on a transcript is not necessarily evidence of significant learning. Pushing students into courses that they are not ready for (or NEVER will be ready for) based on testing requirements causes them to “witness” their education rather than their education becoming a part of them forever.
    There is no evidence that more testing creates more learning—except for how to take that particular test.
    Testing is big business.  If you want to know why they change the tests, follow the money. 
    The key to successful education is a significant relationship between a quality instructor and a rational number of students with a curriculum that covers the bases but allows for creativity, reteaching/relearning and reflection by both teachers and students.
    What we have now in the core courses is a huge list of expectations that does not allow for creativity, reteaching or reflection.  Students do not have the time to learn to THINK.
    Until we put aside extraneous agendas and focus on the sacred moments where true learning occurs and get rid of anything that gets in the way of true learning, we are just spitting on the ocean.

  • Donn Brooks

    Memo to All:  Veteran Teacher should be listened to.  Why in the world do we not know anything about how much money is being spent on the testing program?  We are using canned programs that are ghastly in the way of expense.  How much do these programs cost?  What happened to the program from Plano?  Come on HCISD, quit stonewalling.  Come on HCISD, let’s have a curicullum audit.  Come on Guest, let’s here some response from you.  

  • Lilaknight

    I recall taking a “standardized” test when I was in Jr. High (oops-we don’t have those anymore). It was a test to determine what profession/vocation you would be best at. It was going to help us map out our future.

    They recommended I should be a welder…

    OK – that test took place in the last century… But seriously, a welder?????

  • Donn Brooks

    I will be willing to wager that we will never hear the Texas Association of Business discuss the issue of validity.  Wait with patience until you hear Texas Education Agency discuss validity.  Few people even know what validity is.  Validity determines if a test tests what it is supposed to test.  You see, nobody cares about that thorny little fact. 

Advertisement HTML Help>

Recent Comments

Latest Headlines

The Hays Free Press on Facebook

Photo Gallery

120x600 ad code [Inner pages]
Log in

Our weather forecast is from WP Wunderground

| Congratulations, you read all the way to the bottom.